The Ethics of Reselling Second-Hand Fashion

Are we thrifting for profit or exploitation?

by Laurel Chang

Graphic by Katelyn Holland

In recent years, second-hand shopping has transformed from a niche hobby into a mainstream fashion movement. Platforms like Depop, Poshmark, and eBay have made it easier than ever to buy and sell vintage and pre-loved clothing. However, as thrifting’s popularity has surged, so has the ethical debate surrounding resellers—individuals who buy second-hand garments at low prices and resell them for a profit. Is this practice a clever business move, or does it contribute to the gentrification of thrift stores, making affordable clothing less accessible to those who need it most?

At its core, thrifting aligns with sustainable fashion principles. Shopping second-hand reduces waste, extends the life cycle of garments, and curbs the demand for fast fashion’s environmentally damaging production processes. Many fashion lovers and resellers argue that giving old clothes new life through resale helps promote circular fashion—keeping clothing in use rather than in landfills.

However, when resellers buy large quantities of trendy, high-quality items from thrift stores only to mark them up online, they may be limiting access for lower-income shoppers who rely on these stores for affordable essentials. This raises the question: When does second-hand reselling shift from being sustainable to being exploitative?

As resale platforms thrive, thrift stores in urban areas have seen increased demand for vintage and name-brand clothing. In response, many thrift stores have raised their prices, making it harder for those with limited financial means to afford second-hand clothes. What was once an affordable option for low-income individuals has, in many places, turned into a treasure hunt for online sellers seeking profit.

Some resellers justify their practices by arguing that thrift stores receive an abundance of donations—far more than they can sell. Additionally, organizations like Goodwill and Salvation Army operate as charities, using profits to fund community programs. Yet, this doesn’t erase the reality that resellers often target high-quality and designer items, leaving fewer options for shoppers who don’t have the luxury of spending hours scouring racks for hidden gems.

Reselling second-hand clothing isn’t inherently unethical—many small business owners rely on this practice to make a living, and some even specialize in curating unique, high-quality pieces that might otherwise go unnoticed. Ethical concerns arise, however, when resellers contribute to the rising cost of thrifted clothing without considering the social impact of their business.

One way resellers can operate more ethically is by sourcing inventory responsibly. Shopping at estate sales, flea markets, and online auctions—rather than clearing out local thrift stores—ensures that those in need still have access to affordable clothing. Additionally, resellers can be transparent about their pricing and business practices, fostering a community of conscious consumers who understand the value of second-hand fashion beyond profit.

Ultimately, the ethics of reselling thrifted fashion depends on intention and impact. While it’s fair to profit from the effort of curating and styling pieces, resellers should be mindful of how their actions affect others—especially those who depend on thrift stores for everyday essentials. A truly sustainable fashion movement isn’t just about reducing waste; it’s about making ethical choices that support both people and the planet.

So before filling your cart at the thrift store for your next Depop drop, consider this: Are you contributing to fashion’s circular economy, or are you taking more than your fair share?